* “Census 2020: No consensus on how to count Hispanics, Arab-Americans: Fearing undercount of minorities, civil rights groups criticize plan for new categories in next decennial survey” by Haya El Nasser, Aljazeera America (November 24, 2014)
* The Census Is Still Trying To Find The Best Way To Track Race In America” By Ben Casselman, FiveThirtyEight (November 26, 2014) ”
* “Afro-Latinos want to be recognized as Black” By Saeed Shabazz, Final Call (November 6, 2014)
Census 2020: No consensus on how
to count Hispanics, Arab-Americans
Fearing undercount of minorities, civil rights groups criticize plan for new categories in next decennial survey
by Haya El Nasser | @hayaelna
Aljazeera America (November 24, 2014)
Civil rights groups are sounding the alarm over proposed changes to 2020 Census questionnaires, including combining the Hispanic ethnicity category with the race question.
Some of the changes under consideration may not produce the detailed count needed to enforce anti-discrimination laws and compare data over time, according to leaders of African-American, Asian-American, Hispanic and Arab-American groups.
At a Monday briefing, the groups called for more government testing – in more languages – of revised questions that may affect the all-important count of minorities.
Census data are used in the enforcement of a broad spectrum of civil rights laws, from fair political representation in redistricting to equal opportunity and access to housing, jobs and education.
“Ensuring a fair and accurate census is a top priority,” said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the Leadership Conference Education Fund. “Given how much is at stake, the Census Bureau must get it right.”
As yet there was little consensus on whether the Hispanic ethnicity question should be part of the race category, said Rosalind Gold, senior director of policy, research and advocacy for the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund.
“Latino identity is very complicated,” she said. What it comes down to is, “Do Latinos see themselves when they see the census question?”
Until now, Hispanic identification has been a separate ethnicity question. Those who check off that box are asked to identify what race they are among five – white, black, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian or Native Hawaiian/other Pacific island.
But a growing number of people don’t identify with any of the race categories, and 6.2 percent chose “some other race” in 2010. Hispanics accounted for more than 18.5 million of the 19 million people who checked “some other race” to describe themselves.
The Census Bureau has been conducting tests and is now considering combining race and ethnicity questions. “Many researchers very much believe that Hispanic is not a race and must remain a separate ethnicity because they believe Hispanics are of many races,” said Terri Ann Lowenthal, a consultant to the Leadership Conference and author of “Race and Ethnicity in the 2020 Census: Improving Data to Capture a Multiethnic America,” a report released Monday.
Every 10 years, when the Census Bureau attempts to count each person in the United States – numbers used to allocate funds to communities – the agency revisits the way questions are asked in the face of an increasingly multiracial and multiethnic population that no longer fits neatly into traditional classifications set by the government. In 2000, for example, the census form allowed people for the first time to select more than one race.
The census is now considering adding a Middle Eastern/North African category (MENA) to satisfy Arab-American groups’ demands that they be counted separately.
“There is no category for Arab-American, and there’s a significant undercount in the community,” said Samer Khalaf, national president of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. Many Syrians, Egyptians, Sudanese and other MENA groups have a hard time seeing themselves as white or black, he said.
The Census Bureau’s annual American Community Survey that asks about national origin counts 1.8 million Arab-Americans in the U.S. But other estimates put the number closer to 4 million, Khalaf said.
Minority groups are pushing to count prisoners as residents not of where they’re serving time but of where they usually live.
Among the current race categories – but not for black and white – there are 15 options for specific origin (Chinese, Samoan, Cambodian, for example).
The census now is looking to add a line to every race category for more details about respondents’ origins or tribes. Whites could write German, blacks could write Nigerian and so on. But these options may be available only to those who respond online, Lowenthal said. “We don’t know what percentage of the census will be paper in 2020,” she said.
Losing the option of selecting a detailed race group is of big concern to Asian-Americans. Access to technology has increased, but older people’s access to computers is often limited, said Terry Ao Minnis, director of census and voting programs for Asian Americans Advancing Justice. Not including choices for subgroups of Asians on paper forms will result in less information.
The Census Bureau said it is testing several designs and that all respondents, whether they answer online or not, will have the opportunity to report detailed origin.
“Answering online via a computer is not the only way in which Census will test the inclusion of checkbox categories to collect detailed responses,” said Census spokesman Michael Cook. “These options are also being tested for designs for data collection via smartphone, tablet, in person response, and land-line phones … This research will be explored in our mid-decade testing.”
“The Census Bureau must ensure that we do not move backward,” Minnis said. “We must collect better, not worse, data.”
Hispanic groups worry about the loss of statistics on Latinos of diverse racial backgrounds, such as Afro-Latinos and Indo-Caribbeans. “In our diverse society, a growing number of people find the current race and ethnic categories confusing, or they wish to see their own specific group reflected on the census,” said Census Bureau Director John Thompson in a statement.
The agency is committed to researching approaches that more accurately measure and reflect how people self-identify, and it is continuing discussions “with myriad population groups,” he said.
“We really want to keep an eye on this issue as we move forward,” Gold said. “Latinos are increasingly diverse … We want to make sure that whatever format is used, that we can get information that allows Latinos to express their identities.”
For demographers such as Kenneth Johnson of the University of New Hampshire’s Carsey School of Public Policy, “whatever decision is made, it is imperative that researchers be able to compare racial groups across time,” he said.
Some of his most important research was on the rapid growth and geographic dispersion of the minority child population.
“If there had been changes in definitions of minority populations between decades and if there was no way to bridge between them, we would not be able to determine how much these populations have grown through time or the likely trajectory of future growth,” he said.
Testing of new questionnaires will be conducted next spring in Maricopa County, Arizona, and in Savannah, Georgia. A national test of up to 1 million households is planned for next September. The Census Bureau will send the proposed questions to Congress by early 2017. “What’s important to realize is that the final decision on race and ethnicity questions must be made within two years,” Lowenthal said.
The Census Is Still Trying To Find
The Best Way To Track Race In America
By Ben Casselman
FiveThirtyEight (November 26, 2014)
At FiveThirtyEight, we use census data all the time to track demographic and social trends, from the aging of the U.S. Population to the decline in marriageand shifts in immigration patterns. But the census not only reveals societal changes, it responds to them. This week, we’re examining three changes the Census Bureau is considering for its 2020 questionnaire. In the first two installments, we looked at the proposed changes to the way the census countspeople of Arab ancestry and same-sex couples. Here, in our final article: The bureau ponders a new way of asking about Hispanic ethnicity.
Nancy Lopez considers herself Latina – more specifically, Dominican. But she knows that when she walks down the street, many strangers see her as something else: a black woman.
“Race is not one-dimensional,” said Lopez, a sociologist at the University of New Mexico and co-director of the school’s Institute for the Study of Race and Social Justice. “It’s multidimensional.”
The census has struggled to capture that complexity for its entire history, from 19th-century battles over how to count free black Americans to more modern efforts to categorize the U.S.’s growing mixed-race population. Now as it prepares for its 2020 population count, the Census Bureau is considering its biggest change in decades: combining its questions about race and ethnicity into a single, all-encompassing question.1 Lopez could still, as she did in 2010, mark herself as black and Latina. But she could also select just one category – an option many U.S. Hispanics have said better reflects their self-identity.
That may seem like an academic distinction, but there are significant real-world implications, too. The government uses census data to help draw congressional boundaries, protect voting rights and allocate federal grant dollars. Researchers use it to track discrimination and social trends. And advocacy groups use it to secure political influence.
“Census taking,” said Tanya Hernandez, a Fordham University law professorwho studies discrimination, “is inherently a political act.”
For decades, the federal government – like most researchers – has distinguished between two concepts: race and ethnicity. “Race” refers to physical attributes (skin color, facial structure and the like), while “ethnicity” is tied to culture and ancestry. So someone might be racially white and ethnically Italian, or, in Lopez’s case, racially black and ethnically Dominican.
Since 1980, the census has included separate questions about race and about Hispanic/Latino ethnicity.2 But in practice, the lines between race and ethnicity are often blurry and are becoming more so. Many Latinos, in particular, don’t consider themselves black or white. Of the 48 million Americans who reported being “Hispanic or Latino” in the 2010 census,only about half chose one of the officially recognized racial categories.
Some 14.5 million chose “some other race,” and 6 million didn’t provide an answer.3 Many wrote in answers such as “Mexican,” “Hispanic” or “Latin American,” which are officially considered ethnicities. Roberto Ramirez, head of the Census Bureau’s Ethnicity and Ancestry Branch, said Latinos “either skip the question or they’ll say that they’re Mexican again.”
To the Census Bureau, and to many of the researchers who use its data, that’s a problem. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which sets the federal government’s standards for racial and ethnic categories, doesn’t consider “some other race” to be an official category, which means the Census Bureau has to assign a race to people who don’t answer. That introduces another source of error into the data. And though independent researchers don’t have to worry about the OMB’s official categories, “other” doesn’t do them much good either.
The bureau’s proposed solution: combining the race and ethnicity questions into one. The question would allow respondents to select from several categories4, and then write in more detailed responses below. Respondents could choose more than one category.
This would be only the latest in a long line of changes to the way the census asks about race. Early censuses distinguished between whites, slaves and “other free persons.” In 1850, on the eve of the Civil War, the census included three racial categories: white, black and “mulatto.” In 1890, the categories included not just mulatto but “quadroon” and “octoroon.” It wasn’t until 1970 that respondents selected their own race, rather than having it assigned by a census worker, and it wasn’t until 2000 that people could choose more than one race.5
In the past, critics have accused the Census Bureau for making changes without sufficient research. This time, the bureau is taking no chances. It has conducted tests and focus groups on the proposed change, and is planning another large-scale test for next year. The tests so far have found that the combined question reduces the number of Latinos selecting “some other race” while not reducing the number of people reporting that they are Hispanic or black.
“The respondents have told us, ‘I like this question. I found myself more easily,’ ” said Nicholas Jones, director of race and ethnic research and outreach for the Census Bureau.
But Hernandez, the Fordham law professor, said that although it’s true that many Hispanics don’t identify strongly with one race or another, it isn’t necessarily a reason to change the way the census asks about the subject.
“The census is not a platform for me to express my personal identity,” Hernandez said. “The census is where I get to put what is relevant for our pursuit of equality.”
Hernandez noted that the Census Bureau’s own test found that the combined question reduced the number of people saying they belonged to certain detailed Hispanic groups, such as Mexican or Cuban. That could make it harder to study those groups, she said, because we wouldn’t have complete data on them. And she worried that the proposed design could discourage researchers from looking at how race and ethnicity overlap. Research, for example, has shown that darker-skinned people of any ethnicity endure more discrimination than lighter-skinned people of the same ethnicity.
Other researchers are more ambivalent. In a new report, the Leadership Conference Education Fund, a civil rights organization, praised the Census Bureau’s attempt to improve its data collection but stopped short of endorsing the single-question approach. Among the group’s concerns: the risk that the change would make it difficult to track changes over time, because data from the 2020 and 2010 censuses wouldn’t be directly comparable.
Arturo Vargas, executive director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, an advocacy group that was one of the sponsors of the Leadership Conference report, said the status quo isn’t working. But as to whether the Census Bureau’s plan is the best solution, Vargas demurred.
“At this point,” he said, “I’m for as much research as we can get.”